smartgrrrl's guide to stuff

smartgrrrl's guide to stuff header image 2

Rubicon: From Letters to Numbers

August 10th, 2010 · 7 Comments · reviews, rubicon, television

I am about to out myself as the nerdiest nerd, but I have a question: Do you all know about room escape games? These online Flash games that put you in a locked room and to find your way out you have to a) find stuff, b) figure out how the stuff works together, and c) solve various logic puzzles that range in difficulty from child’s play to beyond MENSA?

No?

Well, never mind, then. Only I was going to say that at one point in this week’s episode of Rubicon, it felt like Will was in a room escape game: dismantling the motorcycle David left him (first episode), finding the photograph of David and David’s son Evan (who wants the bike, swearing that David wanted him to have it), treating the photograph as a clue and using it to deduce that the packing tape stitching together the bike seat was more than just packing tape, finding the number code, and then ripping the seat apart to find the gun.

[The link to room escape games, by the way, leads to a casual game site that picks out some of the best games out there -- and usually provides a walkthrough to consult when you get stuck. I recommend anything by Mateusz Skutnik: his Great Kitchen Escape was the first room escape game I ever played, and his Submachine series is simply the best.]

But back to Rubicon. It’s still a little too early to comment on the central mystery, and frankly this episode doesn’t really provide any forward motion on that front anyway. We get Ed Bancroft and Will Travers agreeing that David was probably murdered and probably saw it coming and that’s why he left all these clues for Will; we get the baseball number codes and then the names of three people out of seven total that were named by the code, and hopefully they’ll come into play soon. Those names, for future reference: Jeffery Garcia, Alfred Bermudez, Randy Hobbs.

At the beginning of the episode, Will’s being followed by someone, and someone other than the two guys who were watching him in the last episode. Will’s told by Ingram that he was being watched as part of his vetting process, but I think that’s BS, especially as he neglected to tell Will that his stalker was FBI (which we find out via the other two guys). I think Ingram wants Will watched for the same reason as the first two guys — to find out how much Will knows and how close he gets to uncovering whatever conspiracy this is.

We also get a tiny glimpse into the private lives of two other characters: it turns out that Miles is having some family issues — which perhaps explains his behavior in the last episode. Maggie said that he was upset about something and was transferring that to the situation in Nigeria; Miles dodges Will’s questions about his family. From the phone call between Miles and his (ex?) wife Maureen, it sounds as though they’re separated, on the way to divorce. And the father of Maggie’s child shows up unexpectedly, and she seems both afraid of him and willing to work out some sort of deal so that their kid can have a “normal life,” but it’s not clear at all what happened between them (is he an ex-con? Was he abusive? Absentee?) and honestly? I don’t really care all that much. I don’t find her character particularly compelling.

Miles raises an interesting question: why is their group studying Yuri Popovich and George Boeck, when they’re the Middle East team? Why isn’t another team investigating Boeck and the other mystery guy meeting with Popovich? It explains Grant’s rather insubordinate “Why?” from last week, when Will handed down the assignment. And it is curious: will it turn out to be connected to Middle East politics, or is it a red herring thrown by this shadowy conspiracy group for the purpose of distracting Will and Will’s team?

There wasn’t much on the Katherine Rhumor front. She goes to dinner with Tom’s friend James, who swears he knew nothing about the townhouse Tom left to Katherine, but then we see him go into the townhouse and grab a photograph of a group of young boys — assumedly Tom and James are among them. I’ll go further and suggest that this photograph is of all of the older men who gather together at the end of the first episode, and we’re dealing with some sort of Skull and Bones/Secret History type thing. Maybe?

One final question: I wonder, as a special Easter egg for viewers, whether each episode’s title is a sort of clue. First episode is “Gone in the Teeth,” second is “The First Day of School,” and this episode is “Keep the Ends Out.” They’re similar to both crossword puzzle clues and acrostic puzzle clues, and don’t really have much to do directly with what happens in each episode (except for “The First Day of School,” which is about Will’s first day as David’s successor). I COULD be overthinking this, as I am wont to do. And I COULD be giving the show too much credit. But it’s a smart show already and I wouldn’t put it past a smart show about word puzzles to do something fun with the episode titles. Something to play with, anyway. Who wants to help?

No related posts.

Tags: ······

  • Bill Mackin

    There was a picture of 7 young friends in that townhouse that is visible when several men, including Spangler (Will’s big boss) and James Wheeler, meet there. They discuss Rhumor’s death and indicate that with his death they are “back on track”. The picture of the 7 youngsters was subsequently taken from the townhouse by James Wheeler.

    These 7 youngsters may have grown up to be the group representing the “fourth” branch of the clover, or at least some shadow group appended to the government. I couldn’t help but also noticing that after breaking the code with the old timer (using the Yankees World Series wins, etc.) Will Travers uses his cell phone to ask a friend to run 7 names through a data base for him. Are these the same 7 people in the picture taken from the townhouse? Have Will and the old timer found the names of these boys in the code that David Hadas left for him?

    In episode three Will only asks his friend to run 3 names: Jeffrey Garcia, Alfred Bermudez and Randy Hobbs. Perhaps he and the old timer have yet to use the dates in the codes to conclusively identify the remaining 4 names, but at least they know that the code represents 4 additional as of yet unnamed persons.

    Or am I just full of doo-doo and over thinking these points?

  • Bill Mackin

    As for the titles of the episodes – interesting question. What do they mean, if anything? Well, I’ll play along as far as my limited intellect will allow. The title of the first episode is “Gone in the Teeth”. This could be a reference to a line in a 1920 Ezra Pound poem called “Hugh Selwyn Mauberley”.

    The relevant lines of the poem read:

    There died a myriad,
    And of the best, among them,
    For an old bitch gone in the teeth,
    For a botched civilization.

    These lines are frequently quoted as being representative of modernist disillusionment after World War I, encapsulating anger about that war that calls into question the value of culture itself which produced it. As far as I can tell, the reference to an “old bitch gone in the teeth” is an indictment of nationhood and nationalism that produces cataclysmic wars with the idea that nationalism and the blind patriotic fervor it produces is an idea that is old, outdated and rightly should be dead (i.e. gone in the teeth). It is not a young pretty idea to be adored but an “old bitch” (i.e. ugly and repulsive).

    Perhaps the title of the first episode borrowed this line to infer that the nationalism and religious fervor engendered by the terrorism and the war on terror is nothing more than an updated version of the patriotic nationalism that led to the horrific consequences of WWI. Many young boys died for nationalism in WWI. Many have died and will die in the struggle between religiously inspired terrorists and those waging a war on terrorism today.

    And, isn’t that really what Rubicon is about – we are watching a show about the warfare of today between intractable foes with diametrically opposed “bitches gone in the teeth” through the eyes of some of the participants in that war – Will Travers and the API crew?

    Thoughts?

  • http://smartgrrrl.tumblr.com Michelle

    Bill, that’s fantastic — I did not notice the photograph when those men
    meet in the townhouse to discuss Rhumor’s death. Nor did I make the
    connection between these men and the seven names Will asks his friend to
    track down. But I do think that he did get all seven names — we were only
    able to hear three of them this week before the scene changed. I’m sure
    we’ll get the rest in due course.

    Aside from Hobbs, though, the other names don’t sound WASPy enough to
    connect them to this shadow group. And we’d have to assume that one of the
    names is “Spangler,” which would certainly freak Will out. But maybe David
    didn’t know about Spangler? Now who’s overthinking?

  • http://smartgrrrl.tumblr.com Michelle

    I don’t know about your “limited intellect,” but clearly I need to step up
    my game. Because this is brilliant! I can absolutely see the connection
    between Pound’s condemnation of patriotic(/fanatical?) nationalism and what
    Rubicon is doing in its first three episodes — particularly as the series
    began with an epigraph from Woodrow Wilson (“Some of the biggest men in the
    United States…know that there is a power somewhere so organized…so
    pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak
    in condemnation of it”), and there’s at least one character who is either
    already disillusioned or quickly on his way to becoming so about his/API’s
    role in foreign affairs: Miles, who first can’t believe that civil unrest in
    Nigeria is dismissed so readily by a major newspaper and then can’t stop
    watching the riots on TV, wondering why they bother gathering all the intel
    if no one listens to them.

    I admit thinking that the titles were more cryptic, though. Is there
    anything that “Hugh Selwyn Mauberley” might have in common with “First Day
    of School” and “Keep the Ends Out”? The latter, anyway, comes from the first
    verse of Johnny Cash’s “I Walk the Line”:

    I keep a close watch on this heart of mine
    I keep my eyes wide open all the time
    I keep the ends out for the tie that binds
    Because you’re mine, I walk the line

    And I’ve always read that third line as an indication that he’s so open to
    the idea of commitment that he’s holding out the ends of the string/rope
    that will bind them together. But I could see Rubicon subverting this
    notion, as they did with the idea of the “lucky” clover that prompted Tom
    Rhumor to commit suicide.

    As for “First Day of School” I can’t get any farther than “Tuesday.”

  • Bill Mackin

    Spangler doesn’t necessarily have to be on the list. He may be a replacement or newcomer. Alternatively, the code sequence for his name hasn’t yet been broken. Since Will only asked for a run down on 3 names, maybe he and the old timer have only been able to positively establish 3 names. Or maybe they have cracked the Spangler name code incorrectly, resulting in one of the 3 names we were made aware of. perhaps a combination of all or none of these – help I am going crazy with conspiracy solving mania!

  • Bill Mackin

    “I keep the ends out for the ties that bind”.

    I Assume you are right about this since it makes sense.

    I was also thinking that “Keep the Ends Out” was meant to lead someone to the 2nd part of that line referring to “the ties that bind” – meaning a relationship that is hard, if not impossible, to dissolve, even if it is fraught with bad feelings and memories. After all, the third episode was predominantly about such relationships and the ties that bind various characters together in life and death:

    1. Miles and his wife – troubled relationship yet he can’t shake it. Wants to repair the damage between them.

    2. Evan Hadas and his father – troubled relationship (David Hadas never visited his son in the mental health facility), but Evan still must have the motorcycle as a permanent reminder of his father.

    3. Maggie Young and her ex-husband – he has now returned to re-start the relationship. Although Maggie is leery, what if Sophie could have her dad again?

    4. Joan Hadas comes to API to retrieve her deceased husband’s belongings in an attempt to take possession of the remaining material things that represent their relationship even though it was a troubled one “David always used to say, ‘church and state,’” she comments. “I just never knew which one I was.”

    5. Katherine Rhumor lies in bed gazing at a photo of a young Tom Rhumor at the beach. That photo, represents the last reminder of the good part of their relationship while the Townhouse represents the bad/secret part of the relationship.

    6. The relationship between James and Tom Rhumor is even examined in this episode: James denies knowing about Tom’s secret townhouse. When Ms. Rhumor asks James “What was he (Tom) up to?” she asks. “True friendship,” replies James, “is forgiving someone in ways you would never forgive an acquaintance.” Again a reference to not being able to shake some relationships (the ties that bind) even when they get shaky.

    I am sure I missed some nuance in the relationships between the other characters, but I get the sense that the title of this episode was pointing directly at the fact that it was going to be an exploration of the “ties that bind” the various characters in their relationships, thus the use of “Keep the Ends Out” as a lead-in to that thought.

  • http://smartgrrrl.tumblr.com Michelle

    True, Spangler isn’t necessarily on the list. I was just thinking that IF
    the seven names are of the men who met in the townhouse after Rhumor died,
    he would be on the list. But he might not be. And Will definitely tells his
    friend that he has seven names (he actually says “I have *about* seven
    names,” so I guess that number is plus or minus), but we don’t hear him name
    all seven.